COLLECTION NAME:
Visual Resources Teaching Collection
mediaCollectionId
ArtArtHiAAH~7~7
Visual Resources Teaching Collection
Collection
true
Image Record ID:
aahi0014107
image_record_id
aahi0014107
Image Record ID
false
Work Title (display):
Page 10 from The Scarecrow Fairy Tale
Work Title (variant):
Die Scheuche Märchen, page 10
Image Title:
full view
Work Description:
In 1925 Dutch graphic designer Theo van Doesburg and German graphic designer Kurt Schwitters collaborated on the revolutionary typographic children’s book, The Scarecrow Fairy Tale (Die Scheuche Märchen). The Scarecrow Fairy Tale had a radical, but practical, purpose: exposing children to a piece of collaborative design intended to advance the designers’ larger program of creation born out of destruction. Doesburg and Schwitters were proponents of the post-World War I design movements Dada and De Stijl. Although Dada and De Stijl had largely discrepant goals, Doesburg and Schwitters found common ground in The Scarecrow Fairy Tale —bringing young people to the vanguard of the universal world culture they believed would be realized through total abstraction in design. Employing typographic elements, with their purely abstract visual qualities, suited their cause... Käte Steinitz, a friend of van Doesburg and Schwitters...did the “expressionistic and awkward” drawings for the book. Page 10: But Mr. Rooster continued on with hic and hac. Then the farmer took the scarecrow’s cane (https://futurehistory.aiga.org/resources/content/2/2/6/8/documents/l_atzmon.pdf). Published by Apossverlag, Hanover.
Work Dates (display):
1925
Work Dates type:
publication
Work Creator (display):
Theo van Doesburg (Dutch, 1883-1931)
Work Creator gender:
male
work_creator_or_agent_gender
male
Work Creator gender
false
Work Creator notes (display):
Doesburg was born on August 30, 1883 and died on March 7, 1931. His given name was Christian Emil Marie Kupper, but he adopted Theo van Doesburg in memory of his father. "I. K. Bonset" and "Aldo Camini" were pseudonyms. Van Doesburg is best known as the founder and editor of the journal 'De Stijl', which brought together painters and architects in support of Modern art. Among his supporters and collaborators were the artist Piet Mondrian, and the architects J. J. P. Oud and Jan Wils. Van Doesburg's own paintings were abstractions based on nature, dissolving the difference between foreground and background. In the early 1920s, Van Doesburg travelled to Germany, where he lectured at the Bauhaus and was involved in the Dada movement. In 1923 he moved to Paris and experimented with different concepts in architecture. Unlike the other sources, Macmillan indicates that van Doesburg was not an architect, although his works "... have some significance for the history of modern architecture... he was a painter, designer, typographer, critic, writer, and teacher...". Dutch architect, painter and prominent member of De Stijl group.
Work Creator (display):
Kurt Schwitters (German, 1887-1948)
Work Creator gender:
male
work_creator_or_agent_gender
male
Work Creator gender
false
Work Creator notes (display):
German painter, sculptor, designer and writer. He studied at the Kunstakademie in Dresden (190914) and served as a clerical officer and mechanical draughtsman during World War I. At first his painting was naturalistic and then Impressionistic, until he came into contact with Expressionist art, particularly the art associated with Der Sturm, in 1918. He painted mystical and apocalyptic landscapes, such as Mountain Graveyard (1912; New York, Guggenheim), and also wrote Expressionist poetry for Der Sturm magazine. He became associated with the Dada movement in Berlin after meeting Hans Arp, Raoul Hausmann, Hannah Höch and Richard Huelsenbeck, and he began to make collages that he called Merzbilder. These were made from waste materials picked up in the streets and parks of Hannover, and in them he saw the creation of a fragile new beauty out of the ruins of German culture. Similarly he began to compose his poetry from snatches of overheard conversations and randomly derived phrases from newspapers and magazines. His mock-romantic poem An Anna Blume, published in Der Sturm in August 1919, was a popular success in Germany. From this time 'Merz' became the name of Schwitters's one-man movement and philosophy. The word derives from a fragment of the word Kommerz, used in an early assemblage (Merzbild, 1919; destr.; see Elderfield, no. 42), for which Schwitters subsequently gave a number of meanings, the most frequent being that of 'refuse' or 'rejects'. In 1919 he wrote: 'The word Merz denotes essentially the combination, for artistic purposes, of all conceivable materials, and, technically, the principle of the equal distribution of the individual materials …. A perambulator wheel, wire-netting, string and cotton wool are factors having equal rights with paint'; such materials were indeed incorporated in Schwitters's large assemblages and painted collages of this period, for example Construction for Noble Ladies (1919; Los Angeles, CA, Co. Mus. A.; see fig. 1; see also Collage). Schwitters's essential aestheticism and formalism alienated him from the political wing of German Dada led by Huelsenbeck, and he was ridiculed as 'the Caspar David Friedrich of the Dadaist Revolution'. Although his work of this period is full of hints and allusions to contemporary political and cultural conditions, unlike the work of George Grosz or John Heartfield it was not polemical or bitterly satirical. Schwitters's ironic response to what he saw as Huelsenbeck's political posturing was the extraordinary absurd story 'Franz Mullers Drahtfrühling, Ersters Kapitel: Ursachen und Beginn der grossen glorreichen Revolution in Revon' published in Der Sturm (xiii/11, 1922), in which an innocent bystander starts a revolution merely by being there. Another more macabre story, 'Die Zwiebel' (Der Sturm, x/7, 1919), underlines Schwitters's romantic view of the artist as sacrificial victim and spiritual leader, a notion likewise quite antipathetic to Huelsenbeck's dialectical materialism and scorn of bourgeois categories. From 1922 to 1930 Schwitters's art was indebted to Russian Constructivism and to De Stijl. Both movements had a great impact in Germany, particularly at the Bauhaus, and Schwitters was a friend of and collaborator with El Lissitzky (on Nasci, Merz, 89, 1924) and Theo van Doesburg (on Die Scheuche, for example, a children's book published as a special issue of Merz in 1925). His magazine Merz, which appeared irregularly from 1923 to 1932, devoted much space to Constructivist art and ideas. The widespread search among avant-garde artists in the 1920s for a new style for the age was shared by Schwitters, who differed from Constructivists mainly in his insistence on 'natural' rather than 'geometrical' forms as the basis for a new visual language. His collages and constructions of the mid-1920s, however, are sharper and more rectilinear than previously, although characteristically irregular and even quizzical in format, for example elikan (c. 1925; New York, MOMA). As his incantatory abstract poem Merz 24. Ursonate (Hannover, 1932) shows, systems and repetitions are never allowed to compromise the expressive potential of the materials used and the free development of organic form; 'Every form', he wrote 'is the frozen instantaneous picture of a process.' In 1924 Schwitters set up his own advertising and design agency in Hannover, the Merz-Werbezentrale. This was a successful enterprise, which secured the accounts of Wagner, makers of Pelikan inks, and of Bahlsen biscuits. He promoted new forms of typography and was the guiding light of an association of modernist advertising agents that included László Moholy-Nagy and César Domela. During this period, when Merz became a 'paying business', he enjoyed life as an entrepreneur, travelling across Europe and earning a reputation as an eccentric and brilliant businessman. In 1927 he combined with friedrich Vordemberge-gildewart to form a group known as 'die abstrakten hannover'. He also instigated the 'ring neue werbegestalter'. The most extraordinary project by Schwitters between the two World Wars was the Merzbau, a vast sculptural construction, which took over part of the artist's home and studio in Hannover, begun in 1923 and unfinished when he left Germany in December 1936 (see fig. 2; reconstruction, 198083; Hannover, Sprengel Mus.). He had spoken early in his career of his 'ultimate aspiration' being 'the union of art and non-art in the Merz total world view'. The refuse and objets trouvés of his assemblages, collected and stored with a manic passion in suitcases and specially made wooden boxes, became the cult objects of what was in Max Ernst's words 'a huge abstract grotto', made around and within a basic structure of wire, wood and plastered struts. The Merzbau was in effect an elaborate autobiographical 'growth' of interconnecting grottoes, in which pieces of friends' clothing, hair and even the artist's own bottled urine were placed along with a host of other bizarre objects in compartments and behind secret panels. It was entirely destroyed by an Allied bomb in 1943. The 1930s were a period of change and eventual tragedy for Schwitters. He contributed to the Parisian magazine Cercle et Carré and joined the Abstraction-Création group. After Hitler's rise to power in 1933, however, Schwitters's links with international modernism were broken, and he spent more and more time in Norway, where his Merzbilder incorporated 'natural' forms, such as pieces of stone and wood, and where he painted naturalistic landscapes. In 1937 his work was included in the Entartete kunst exhibition, selected by the Nazis, and in the same year he fled with his son to Lysaker, near Oslo, leaving his wife in Hannover, where she died in 1944. In Lysaker he constructed a second Merzbau, which he referred to as the 'Haus am Bakken'. Although it was destroyed by fire in 1951, and no photographs of it were taken, it is known from Schwitters's writings that he planned this Merzbau carefully and intended it to be transportable. Schwitters arrived in England in 1940 and was immediately interned in a camp on the Isle of Man. Here, in the company of other German artists and intellectuals, he tried to revive the popular Merz evenings he had staged in Hannover in the 1920s. He continued to make collages and also sculpture, some of which was apparently concocted from porridge and stale bread. Many fellow inmates considered him to be a rather pathetic relic of a dead avant-garde movement. On his release in October 1941 he moved to London, where he lived with his son and a devoted friend, Edith Thomas. In 1945 he moved to Little Langdale, near Ambleside in the Lake District, where he remained until his death, often painting portraits to earn a living. Schwitters's work in England comprised reliefs and sculptures that verge on the quaint, for which he used a loose brushwork and incorporated pieces of wood, stone and shells. He also made collages that frequently incorporated American magazine and commercial imagery, sometimes in conjunction with Old Master images, for example Merz 42 (Like an Old Master) (1942; Hannover, Sprengel Mus.). These seem to anticipate Pop art in their interests and to extend the tradition of Dada collage, in which Schwitters had made his début as a modernist. Schwitters also made simple plaster sculptures, such as All-embracing Sculpture (c. 19435; Cologne, Gal. Gmurzynska), which in their biomorphic qualities reveal a debt to Hans Arp. In 1947, with financial aid from MOMA, New York, Schwitters began work on the Merzbarn in an old straw barn in Langdale Valley. The project was unfinished at his death, but a wall (l. 3.5 m) that was complete was removed and installed at the Hatton Gallery, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, in 1965. As with his contemporaneous reliefs, the abstracted forms derive from natural sources and reflect the qualities of the surrounding landscape. Despite Schwitters's links and associations with Dada, there is something in his approach to art and life that makes him an uneasy member of the conventional modernist pantheon. His Dadaism, in the form of his Merz productions, was in some crucial senses antipathetic to Dada; his Constructivism had, at its core, a faith in the aesthetic and moral properties of natural form quite at odds with the formal and intellectual premises of classic Constructivist art; his move towards a lyrical, romantic art in the last 20 years of his life perhaps underlines his reaction against those movements with which he is most usually identified. This belief in nature as a transcendent category, and in the need for artists to continue to study the natural world, is reflected in his practice, intermittently throughout his life, of painting conventional landscapes and portraits. In many respects the obsessional Merzbau may, even through photographs, present the fullest immediate image of Schwitters's complex and contradictory art. It allows one to see the childlike and convoluted, the grandiose and bathetic, the abstract and the representational, the elated and troubled, all in one work. (Grove Art Online Accessed 2006-07-28)
Work Creator (display):
Käte Traumann Steinitz (American, born Germany, 1889-1975)
Work Creator gender:
female
work_creator_or_agent_gender
female
Work Creator gender
false
Work Creator (display):
Paul Vogt (active early 1930's)
Work Creator notes (display):
typographist
Work Creator Multiple Roles (display):
Written and designed by Kurt Schwitters, Käte Steinitz, and Theo van Doesburg (Dutch, 1883–1931); typesetter was Paul Vogt.
Work Subject:
Dada
subject
Dada
Work Subject
false
Work Subject:
De Stijl
subject
De Stijl
Work Subject
false
Work Subject:
children's books
subject
children's books
Work Subject
false
Work Subject:
societies
subject
societies
Work Subject
false
Work Subject:
propaganda
subject
propaganda
Work Subject
false
Work Worktype:
books
work_type
books
Work Worktype
false
Work Worktype:
children's books
work_type
children's books
Work Worktype
false
Work Worktype:
illustrations (layout features)
work_type
illustrations (layout features)
Work Worktype
false
Work Worktype:
prints (visual works)
work_type
prints (visual works)
Work Worktype
false
Work Category (VRC classification):
books
work_category__ucbaahvrc_classification_
books
Work Category (VRC classification)
false
Work Category (VRC classification):
prints
work_category__ucbaahvrc_classification_
prints
Work Category (VRC classification)
false
Work Measurements (display):
8 in (H) x 9 5/8 in (W)
Image Source Reproduction citation:
Vallye, Anna. Leger: Modern Art and the Metropolis. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2013. Print.
image_source_copy_from_print_name
Vallye, Anna. Leger: Modern Art and the Metropolis. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2013. Print.
Image Source Reproduction citation
false
Image Source Reproduction refid:
978-0-87633-245-0
Image Source Reproduction page number:
126
Image Source Reproduction plate-figure number:
74
Image Source Reproduction refid type:
ISBN
Image Rights (display):
unknown
Image Rights fair use checklist:
1) use of this image is for education and educational research; 2) access is restricted to University of Colorado and Auraria Higher Education Center communities; 3) the original photographer is credited if known; 4) the image is published; 5) the amount of the work in relation to the whole is needed for education or educational research; 6) the number of derivatives is the minimum required for education or educational research; 7) the image has not been found to be reasonably available for sale; 8) duplication of the image does not violate preexisting contracts.
Work Rights (display):
© public domain
Terms of Agreement and Conditions of Use:
YOU AGREE: Luna Imaging's Insight Software and the digital image collection associated with it (the Software) are being provided by the University of Colorado under the following license. By obtaining, using, and/or copying this work, you (the Licensee) agree that you have read, understood, and will comply with the following terms and conditions. 1. The Software contains the University of Colorado's Department of Art and Art History's implementation of a digital image collection; 2. Any images obtained through use of the Software will be used only for non-profit, educational purposes; 3. The use of images obtained through the software will only be used while the Licensee is either: a) an employee of the University of Colorado, Metropolitan State College of Denver, or the Community College of Denver, or b) an enrolled student at the University of Colorado, Metropolitan State College of Denver, or the Community College of Denver; 4. When the Licensee is no longer an employee or student of the University of Colorado, Metropolitan State College of Denver or Community College of Denver, either by an action of the University of Colorado, Metropolitan State College of Denver or the Community College of Denver or due to actions of the Licensee, the licensee will cease to use any images exported from the Department of Art and Art History's digital image collection; 5. The Licensee agrees to indemnify the University for claims and liability arising out of the use of the Software or for any violations of this license; 6. THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SUPPLIES THE SOFTWARE WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
CU Copyright Statement:
The contents of the University of Colorado Digital Library are available for your use in research, teaching, and private study. Some of these items are protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and some items may have additional restrictions. If you use the items in this collection, make sure you abide by any restrictions stated in the descriptive data window. The nature of these collections often makes it difficult to determine the copyright status of an item. We have made every effort to provide information about copyright owners and other restrictions in the descriptive data window. Ultimately, however, it is your responsibility to use the item according to the terms governing its use. If you are a copyright holder and the information is either not listed or listed incorrectly, please let us know so that we can update the information on our site.
Holding Institution:
University of Colorado Boulder
Collection:
Art and Art History Visual Resources Center
Collection info and contact:
For information about this collection, see